For the sake of clarity, let's talk about VE so I don't confuse anyone.
VE is essentially the ratio of the volume equivalent of air mass actually drawn into cylinder / actual volume of the cylinder, both corrected for pressure.
If we measure volume at the air intake (ambient presure), a turbo or SC increases increases the air mass AND volume flowing through that point. When the ECU makes VE calculations, it is actually calculating mass, not volume. When we see a title of "200" on a cell in the load table, it means the engine is flowing the equivalent of 200% air mass of the theoretical normally aspirated max, but the volume of air flowing through the ports (and all pressurized areas) at any given rpm is roughly the same as if it were normally aspirated.
If we measure volume at the throttle body (or any other pressurized area), the turbo is not increasing the volume of air. In other words, the turbo is not making the engine mechanically more efficient. Things that directly affect mechanical efficiency are intake manifold/runner dimensions, cams and timing thereof, exhaust manifold runners, intake and exhaust ports, etc.
For those who were under the impression that the turbo is making the engine mechanically more efficient because it is 'forcing' air into the engine, that is incorrect.
VE is essentially the ratio of the volume equivalent of air mass actually drawn into cylinder / actual volume of the cylinder, both corrected for pressure.
If we measure volume at the air intake (ambient presure), a turbo or SC increases increases the air mass AND volume flowing through that point. When the ECU makes VE calculations, it is actually calculating mass, not volume. When we see a title of "200" on a cell in the load table, it means the engine is flowing the equivalent of 200% air mass of the theoretical normally aspirated max, but the volume of air flowing through the ports (and all pressurized areas) at any given rpm is roughly the same as if it were normally aspirated.
If we measure volume at the throttle body (or any other pressurized area), the turbo is not increasing the volume of air. In other words, the turbo is not making the engine mechanically more efficient. Things that directly affect mechanical efficiency are intake manifold/runner dimensions, cams and timing thereof, exhaust manifold runners, intake and exhaust ports, etc.
For those who were under the impression that the turbo is making the engine mechanically more efficient because it is 'forcing' air into the engine, that is incorrect.
Comment