Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New Header design for stock location applications

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    I don't want to stray too far off topic in this thread, but in a nutshell:

    The presence of a turbo simplifies the exhaust design strategy, but it doesn't make things easier on the intake side. The intake is flowing a greater mass of air, but not a greater volume (only increased pressure), so the design criteria is pretty standard dry-flow port injected FI theory.

    Where stock TF intake manifolds are concerned, they are fine for the mild street applications, and deliver good low and midrange torque. For high hp, bigger turbo (higher rpm) applications, the runners are too long/narrow and the plenum too small for big power. When people start talking about 50-trim T3/T4 and such, exchanging the stock piece for a unit with ported/shortened runners and gutted upper becomes a better option. The shorter runners exchange low rpm efficiency for improved high rpm efficiency, and the larger plenum volume is better suited for high rpm breathing. Users that go to large turbos, custom exhaust headers and high-flow heads with big cams and standalone ECUs will benefit further from intelligently designed, hand-fabbed intake manifolds with short, larger intake runners and large plenums.

    Such a manifold looks like this:
    Last edited by Ted B; 12-03-2006, 07:03 PM.
    2003 EVO - 2.0L 500whp
    1986 SVO - Work in progress . . .

    Comment


    • #17
      I need to really gut my Upper intake badly lol.
      testing will be on a couple stock and mild mod SVO's, if things go well i'll be testing one of these on my motor.

      Mods are in the sig and then some. As soon as i know something the board will know something.

      Comment


      • #18
        I am "blown" away with all this good theory! This is leading to a good technical exchange. Sweet.

        We hope to provide dyno data on everything from completely stock to various modifications including: porting of the head and intakes, some cams, and our mass air conversion. This all takes time and $$$.

        Jim
        Jim Whelan

        Comment


        • #19
          Off subject....Jim, how is the new web site coming....still hope to see it everytime I clink on your link.

          Comment


          • #20
            Looks very "similar" to the ATR - The big question for me is... how accessable are the bolts to bolt it to the heard - how much of a turn will you be able to give which an open or closed end wrench when intalling it on an engine that is in the car.

            Comment


            • #21
              Bolt accessibility is pretty good compared to the other headers. It was one of the significant design factors. Also, using the Stage 8 bolts makes it easier.

              The new web site is going to be great, but man is it time consuming, especially when it is all volunteer labor!

              I need 36 hour days.

              Jim
              Jim Whelan

              Comment


              • #22
                Right. I forgot about that.

                Thanks,
                Jim Whelan

                Comment

                Working...
                X