Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

stock intercooler core upgrade..

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    What's up with the small hose connected to the front of the IC?

    Comment


    • #17
      I believe you are referring to the bypass/recirculating valve.
      Chad
      86 2A BWD, 1988 Mustang lx 5.0

      Comment


      • #18
        Forced4 bypass kit, correct

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by inerceptor View Post
          Just ordered and installed the same intercooler core. Fits nice and looks even better. I can definitely feel the difference.
          Thanks for the update. I am getting ready to do the same thing. How difficult is it to modify the seals? Thanks!
          Kevin Boyd

          Comment


          • #20
            I think it was Tiny Avenger that stated the intake was only capable of flowing 200 cfm, so any improvement ahead of the intake is negated or limited by the intake.
            My wife says it's a sickness...what do you think?

            Comment


            • #21
              Intercooler Turbo Boost (psi) Exhaust Manifold Results (rwhp)
              None Stock 13.5 Stock EH 173
              None Stock 15.5 Stock EH 183
              None Stock 18.5 Stock EH 210
              None Stock 18.5 Header 207
              Tbird Stock 18.5 Header 235
              Tbird T04 21 Header 263
              Vortech T04 21 Header 284
              These are the Tiny avenger results also. It shows with a stock intercooler at 18.5 psi and a header it resulted in 207 hp. Now with a Tbird intercooler(which flows more air) and the same 18.5 psi and header it made 235 hp.
              Chad
              86 2A BWD, 1988 Mustang lx 5.0

              Comment


              • #22
                JKBOYD,
                It wasn't to difficult to modify. I just had to trim a little off of the edges but be careful. Also, I used the "Right Stuff Sealant" as was mentioned in the earlier post. I put it all back together and gave it a day to dry before I tested it. As I said earlier I am pleased with the results. But to each is own. Until the earlier post I had not even looked at the Tiny Avengers post but it is interesting on some of the results that he posted.
                Chad
                86 2A BWD, 1988 Mustang lx 5.0

                Comment


                • #23
                  Thanks for all the info, I'm going to pick one up after the holidays.
                  Kevin Boyd

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Interesting. I thought the IC was all welded together.

                    I'm running a TC IC at the moment, and it's okay, except it hits the strut tower bar. I have some split fuel line on the lip to prevent it from hitting metal-to-metal. I wonder if this core would flow any better than the TC IC, or if the TC IC is still the way to go. I was planning on trimming the intake seal down on the TC IC so it doesn't hit the bar any more, and think that's the way to go for me, until I finally break down and get a FMIC, anyway. :-)

                    What did the core cost from Bell Intercoolers? Just wondering, as I do have the OEM IC in storage.
                    Gene Beaird,
                    86 2R SVO, G Stock,
                    Pearland, Texas

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      the bell flows 600cfm..that blows away the stock and TC IC's..

                      I think it was $205

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        I just got a quote for $209 plus shipping.
                        Kevin Boyd

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Wow, sounds cool. Vendor and part number????

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by BrianO View Post
                            It's from Bell Intercoolers and this is the one MD used for the swaps way back when.
                            3.50 x 9.00 x 6.00 Part # A350090060
                            Originally posted by chalkys_explorer View Post
                            Wow, sounds cool. Vendor and part number????
                            Is that not it?

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              that is exactly it.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                How'd I not see that

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X