After 5 months of use, here are some preliminary comments about the Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 tires. These replaced a very good tire, the Continental Extreme Contact Sport, that is no longer available in sizes that fit our SVO’s.
Hard driving under very different weather conditions is not the same as comparing competition A to A track times, but they still show enough individual characteristics to make some comments on their street handling.
(Note, I have included the Costco dated receipt for confirmation that I did buy a set)
So in no particular order of importance, here are comments:
1.The Michelin’s have a symmetrical looking passenger tread. The Continental’s had an asymmetrical performance tread. More rubber surface area and less tread grooving, noticeable on the outer threads.
2.The Michelin’s I call a “singing” tire. On grooved concrete roads at 60+ MPH, they make these tires (front and back) translate those road surfaces into noticeable whines and hums. Interestingly, above 85MPH it quiets down a bit. Something, driving Continentals I did not notice on dirty highways in Iowa, flooded roads in Nebraska, hailstorms in Colorado or bbq hot freeways in Arizona.
3.The Michelins seem to have a slightly faster reaction. Odd, since they have a deeper groove depth. But this could be that they are just newer.
4.The Continentals do hold the turn in better. The Michelins with a quicker turn in start to scrub off with a bit more oversteer. Might be due to a harder tire compound. Just a wild guess based on the Michelins having a longer tire wear warranty. Note, front end wheel geometry changes are minimized with a bumpsteer kit, lowered/stiffer springs and bushing.
5.Can’t compare the wet characteristics yet. But I have driven and stopped the Michelin’s at 50+MPH on wet asphalt. Didn’t notice any large differences – yet. If I do, I will update this post.
6.On cold mornings, both drive the same. The Michelins sing when hot and cold.
7.And this might seem an odd comment but the Michelins keep the Amourall shine appearance better than the Michelins. Again, might be due to newer rubber.
8.The way this SVO is driven, stop and go, 15 minute cold trips to Home Depot and sustained (65+) high speed highway speeds, will not allow an accurate comparison.
I wanted to post this now so that if you need tires, please start planning now. As with all of the SVO’s consumables (tires, fans belts, lighting, hoses, fluids, electrical systems etc) , the availability of performance products are slowly disappearing. The Michelin tire catalog now only goes back to 1983. And Continental does not make their top high performance tire in our size.
9. The Michelins cost more, even with Costco pricing.
10. Overall the street the Michelins are just fine.
02 Michelin Tire Des.jpg
03 Continental Extreme Contact Sport 02.jpg
01 Costco Michelin Tires Receipt.jpg
Hard driving under very different weather conditions is not the same as comparing competition A to A track times, but they still show enough individual characteristics to make some comments on their street handling.
(Note, I have included the Costco dated receipt for confirmation that I did buy a set)
So in no particular order of importance, here are comments:
1.The Michelin’s have a symmetrical looking passenger tread. The Continental’s had an asymmetrical performance tread. More rubber surface area and less tread grooving, noticeable on the outer threads.
2.The Michelin’s I call a “singing” tire. On grooved concrete roads at 60+ MPH, they make these tires (front and back) translate those road surfaces into noticeable whines and hums. Interestingly, above 85MPH it quiets down a bit. Something, driving Continentals I did not notice on dirty highways in Iowa, flooded roads in Nebraska, hailstorms in Colorado or bbq hot freeways in Arizona.
3.The Michelins seem to have a slightly faster reaction. Odd, since they have a deeper groove depth. But this could be that they are just newer.
4.The Continentals do hold the turn in better. The Michelins with a quicker turn in start to scrub off with a bit more oversteer. Might be due to a harder tire compound. Just a wild guess based on the Michelins having a longer tire wear warranty. Note, front end wheel geometry changes are minimized with a bumpsteer kit, lowered/stiffer springs and bushing.
5.Can’t compare the wet characteristics yet. But I have driven and stopped the Michelin’s at 50+MPH on wet asphalt. Didn’t notice any large differences – yet. If I do, I will update this post.
6.On cold mornings, both drive the same. The Michelins sing when hot and cold.
7.And this might seem an odd comment but the Michelins keep the Amourall shine appearance better than the Michelins. Again, might be due to newer rubber.
8.The way this SVO is driven, stop and go, 15 minute cold trips to Home Depot and sustained (65+) high speed highway speeds, will not allow an accurate comparison.
I wanted to post this now so that if you need tires, please start planning now. As with all of the SVO’s consumables (tires, fans belts, lighting, hoses, fluids, electrical systems etc) , the availability of performance products are slowly disappearing. The Michelin tire catalog now only goes back to 1983. And Continental does not make their top high performance tire in our size.
9. The Michelins cost more, even with Costco pricing.
10. Overall the street the Michelins are just fine.
02 Michelin Tire Des.jpg
03 Continental Extreme Contact Sport 02.jpg
01 Costco Michelin Tires Receipt.jpg
Comment