Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Stumbling and Studdering

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Alright, I'll see what I can find. Thanks!
    My cars:
    1965 Mustang GT
    1984 Mustang SVO

    Comment


    • #17
      You mean the other two are VAM and VAT. The SVO doesn't have a MAF or IAT unless its been converted.
      Mike S

      '86 SVO 9L Leather
      '86 SVO 9L Road Warrior
      '96 300ZXTT

      Comment


      • #18
        exactly

        Comment


        • #19
          A test of the VAM showed 255mV at rest, so I need a new VAM?
          My cars:
          1965 Mustang GT
          1984 Mustang SVO

          Comment


          • #20
            I was also wondering, how would I know if it was the actual computer causing problems, rather than other things?
            My cars:
            1965 Mustang GT
            1984 Mustang SVO

            Comment


            • #21
              heres teh thread on testing it.. with diagram courtesy of navy

              Comment


              • #22
                Thanks Brian, I tested and it came back with 255mV, so do I need a new VAM?
                My cars:
                1965 Mustang GT
                1984 Mustang SVO

                Comment


                • #23
                  Well I replaced the VAM and the problem still persists. What else could it be?

                  The fuel pressure isn't dumping when the problem happens either, it's remaining constant.
                  My cars:
                  1965 Mustang GT
                  1984 Mustang SVO

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by fast65 View Post
                    Well I replaced the VAM and the problem still persists. What else could it be?

                    The fuel pressure isn't dumping when the problem happens either, it's remaining constant.

                    Wires to the VAM or VAT.
                    Mike S

                    '86 SVO 9L Leather
                    '86 SVO 9L Road Warrior
                    '96 300ZXTT

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by fast65 View Post
                      Thanks Brian, I tested and it came back with 255mV, so do I need a new VAM?
                      I just tested mine the other day - there was another thread on here about testing the VAM. You probably can't take that new one back, but if you can the resting is 255 and full open is around 4.5!
                      1984 on its way back to 9W
                      1986 2R

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Just a quick question for you. How long does it run before it starts to lose power, and, when it does and you come to a stop, does the engine quit?

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by pstocker View Post
                          Just a quick question for you. How long does it run before it starts to lose power, and, when it does and you come to a stop, does the engine quit?
                          Quite honestly I can't remember exactly. Initially it took about 10 minutes before it started, but then that time period shortened. I don't believe it does die when I come to a stop, but I'm not 100% sure.
                          My cars:
                          1965 Mustang GT
                          1984 Mustang SVO

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Possible fuel pump or maybe fuel filter? Have you tried replacing the filter?

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by GAboySVO View Post
                              You mean the other two are VAM and VAT. The SVO doesn't have a MAF or IAT unless its been converted.
                              54 = failure of ACT/IAT. VAT throws a 58 on LA3. 54 is an expected code unless you've added an ACT sensor with the LA3 swap. so that leaves ..

                              the 66, which is MAF/VAM went below .4v during operation, there are a few things that can cause this. since you already eliminated the VAM as a possible issue, the problem likely lies in the harness. did you check the VREF as well as the VAF pins as documented in the troubleshooting guide that navy posted in the other thread? VAF should be 1-5v full sweep. if you're getting .255v at the VAF pin at the VAM, vane closed, with both new and old VAMs, something else is wrong. either VREF is low at the VAM, or VAF is shorting to ground.

                              either of which likely points to something busted up in the harness. if i were in your shoes, id just start unwrapping the harness starting at the VAM connector and surveying the damages. 84s are not known for their quality harness insulation; most likely that chunk of harness is turning to dust.
                              redneck engineered 84 2a, stock 84 1D.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Alex L View Post
                                54 = failure of ACT/IAT. VAT throws a 58 on LA3. 54 is an expected code unless you've added an ACT sensor with the LA3 swap. so that leaves ..

                                the 66, which is MAF/VAM went below .4v during operation, there are a few things that can cause this. since you already eliminated the VAM as a possible issue, the problem likely lies in the harness. did you check the VREF as well as the VAF pins as documented in the troubleshooting guide that navy posted in the other thread? VAF should be 1-5v full sweep. if you're getting .255v at the VAF pin at the VAM, vane closed, with both new and old VAMs, something else is wrong. either VREF is low at the VAM, or VAF is shorting to ground.

                                either of which likely points to something busted up in the harness. if i were in your shoes, id just start unwrapping the harness starting at the VAM connector and surveying the damages. 84s are not known for their quality harness insulation; most likely that chunk of harness is turning to dust.
                                Alright, thanks, I'll call my brother and see if he can check that...seeings as I'm 4 hours away from the car :/
                                My cars:
                                1965 Mustang GT
                                1984 Mustang SVO

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X